path: root/tools
diff options
authorIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>2011-03-15 20:51:09 +0100
committerIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>2011-03-15 20:51:09 +0100
commit5e814dd597c42daeb8d2a276e64a6ec986ad0e2a (patch)
treee06a7c18e840745869ffa72d568d4c125c7e3fb4 /tools
parent137ee20ddd10fdc20600c389fe63edab0c39cb1a (diff)
perf probe: Clean up probe_point_lazy_walker() return value
Newer compilers (gcc 4.6) complains about: return ret < 0 ?: 0; For the following reason: util/probe-finder.c: In function ‘probe_point_lazy_walker’: util/probe-finder.c:1331:18: error: the omitted middle operand in ?: will always be ‘true’, suggest explicit middle operand [-Werror=parentheses] And indeed the return value is a somewhat obscure (but correct) value of 'true', so return 'ret' instead - this is cleaner and unconfuses GCC as well. Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com> Cc: Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@hitachi.com> Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com> Cc: Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@hitachi.com> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> LKML-Reference: <new-submission> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Diffstat (limited to 'tools')
1 files changed, 1 insertions, 1 deletions
diff --git a/tools/perf/util/probe-finder.c b/tools/perf/util/probe-finder.c
index 17f9c4a66ddd..194f9e2a3285 100644
--- a/tools/perf/util/probe-finder.c
+++ b/tools/perf/util/probe-finder.c
@@ -1328,7 +1328,7 @@ static int probe_point_lazy_walker(const char *fname, int lineno,
* Continue if no error, because the lazy pattern will match
* to other lines
- return ret < 0 ?: 0;
+ return ret < 0 ? ret : 0;
/* Find probe points from lazy pattern */

Privacy Policy