path: root/arch/s390/include/asm/mem_encrypt.h
diff options
authorThiago Jung Bauermann <bauerman@linux.ibm.com>2019-08-06 01:49:17 -0300
committerMichael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>2019-08-09 22:52:08 +1000
commit284e21fab2cfcf90dacce565e0b12f29e5df00c1 (patch)
treef3ff0d324d2c19857a4e842a1c7369e0421e1fc2 /arch/s390/include/asm/mem_encrypt.h
parente740815a97e2b6d6446792f4328378e66de166d1 (diff)
x86, s390/mm: Move sme_active() and sme_me_mask to x86-specific header
Now that generic code doesn't reference them, move sme_active() and sme_me_mask to x86's <asm/mem_encrypt.h>. Also remove the export for sme_active() since it's only used in files that won't be built as modules. sme_me_mask on the other hand is used in arch/x86/kvm/svm.c (via __sme_set() and __psp_pa()) which can be built as a module so its export needs to stay. Signed-off-by: Thiago Jung Bauermann <bauerman@linux.ibm.com> Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Reviewed-by: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@amd.com> Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20190806044919.10622-5-bauerman@linux.ibm.com
Diffstat (limited to 'arch/s390/include/asm/mem_encrypt.h')
1 files changed, 1 insertions, 3 deletions
diff --git a/arch/s390/include/asm/mem_encrypt.h b/arch/s390/include/asm/mem_encrypt.h
index 3eb018508190..ff813a56bc30 100644
--- a/arch/s390/include/asm/mem_encrypt.h
+++ b/arch/s390/include/asm/mem_encrypt.h
@@ -4,9 +4,7 @@
#ifndef __ASSEMBLY__
-#define sme_me_mask 0ULL
-static inline bool sme_active(void) { return false; }
+static inline bool mem_encrypt_active(void) { return false; }
extern bool sev_active(void);
int set_memory_encrypted(unsigned long addr, int numpages);

Privacy Policy