aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/security
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorTHOBY Simon <Simon.THOBY@viveris.fr>2021-08-16 08:11:00 +0000
committerMimi Zohar <zohar@linux.ibm.com>2021-08-16 17:33:07 -0400
commit583a80ae86b5ceb68119cfb9a37404cf22f6cc46 (patch)
tree69a1369662423cbd98f3f39584633e7175d95c32 /security
parent1624dc0086056c3a35fd34b0235bb1eb88c1c4d5 (diff)
IMA: add a policy option to restrict xattr hash algorithms on appraisal
The kernel has the ability to restrict the set of hash algorithms it accepts for the security.ima xattr when it appraises files. Define a new IMA policy rule option "appraise_algos=", using the mentioned mechanism to expose a user-toggable policy knob to opt-in to that restriction and select the desired set of algorithms that must be accepted. When a policy rule uses the 'appraise_algos' option, appraisal of a file referenced by that rule will now fail if the digest algorithm employed to hash the file was not one of those explicitly listed in the option. In its absence, any hash algorithm compiled in the kernel will be accepted. For example, on a system where SELinux is properly deployed, the rule appraise func=BPRM_CHECK obj_type=iptables_exec_t \ appraise_algos=sha256,sha384 will block the execution of iptables if the xattr security.ima of its executables were not hashed with either sha256 or sha384. Signed-off-by: THOBY Simon <Simon.THOBY@viveris.fr> Reviewed-by: Lakshmi Ramasubramanian <nramas@linux.microsoft.com> Signed-off-by: Mimi Zohar <zohar@linux.ibm.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'security')
-rw-r--r--security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c74
1 files changed, 70 insertions, 4 deletions
diff --git a/security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c b/security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c
index 1536e6f5eb22..cb86da0e562b 100644
--- a/security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c
+++ b/security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c
@@ -960,7 +960,7 @@ enum {
Opt_fsuuid, Opt_uid_eq, Opt_euid_eq, Opt_fowner_eq,
Opt_uid_gt, Opt_euid_gt, Opt_fowner_gt,
Opt_uid_lt, Opt_euid_lt, Opt_fowner_lt,
- Opt_appraise_type, Opt_appraise_flag,
+ Opt_appraise_type, Opt_appraise_flag, Opt_appraise_algos,
Opt_permit_directio, Opt_pcr, Opt_template, Opt_keyrings,
Opt_label, Opt_err
};
@@ -995,6 +995,7 @@ static const match_table_t policy_tokens = {
{Opt_fowner_lt, "fowner<%s"},
{Opt_appraise_type, "appraise_type=%s"},
{Opt_appraise_flag, "appraise_flag=%s"},
+ {Opt_appraise_algos, "appraise_algos=%s"},
{Opt_permit_directio, "permit_directio"},
{Opt_pcr, "pcr=%s"},
{Opt_template, "template=%s"},
@@ -1095,7 +1096,8 @@ static bool ima_validate_rule(struct ima_rule_entry *entry)
return false;
if (entry->action != APPRAISE &&
- entry->flags & (IMA_DIGSIG_REQUIRED | IMA_MODSIG_ALLOWED | IMA_CHECK_BLACKLIST))
+ entry->flags & (IMA_DIGSIG_REQUIRED | IMA_MODSIG_ALLOWED |
+ IMA_CHECK_BLACKLIST | IMA_VALIDATE_ALGOS))
return false;
/*
@@ -1125,7 +1127,7 @@ static bool ima_validate_rule(struct ima_rule_entry *entry)
IMA_UID | IMA_FOWNER | IMA_FSUUID |
IMA_INMASK | IMA_EUID | IMA_PCR |
IMA_FSNAME | IMA_DIGSIG_REQUIRED |
- IMA_PERMIT_DIRECTIO))
+ IMA_PERMIT_DIRECTIO | IMA_VALIDATE_ALGOS))
return false;
break;
@@ -1137,7 +1139,7 @@ static bool ima_validate_rule(struct ima_rule_entry *entry)
IMA_INMASK | IMA_EUID | IMA_PCR |
IMA_FSNAME | IMA_DIGSIG_REQUIRED |
IMA_PERMIT_DIRECTIO | IMA_MODSIG_ALLOWED |
- IMA_CHECK_BLACKLIST))
+ IMA_CHECK_BLACKLIST | IMA_VALIDATE_ALGOS))
return false;
break;
@@ -1187,6 +1189,28 @@ static bool ima_validate_rule(struct ima_rule_entry *entry)
return true;
}
+static unsigned int ima_parse_appraise_algos(char *arg)
+{
+ unsigned int res = 0;
+ int idx;
+ char *token;
+
+ while ((token = strsep(&arg, ",")) != NULL) {
+ idx = match_string(hash_algo_name, HASH_ALGO__LAST, token);
+
+ if (idx < 0) {
+ pr_err("unknown hash algorithm \"%s\"",
+ token);
+ return 0;
+ }
+
+ /* Add the hash algorithm to the 'allowed' bitfield */
+ res |= (1U << idx);
+ }
+
+ return res;
+}
+
static int ima_parse_rule(char *rule, struct ima_rule_entry *entry)
{
struct audit_buffer *ab;
@@ -1522,6 +1546,25 @@ static int ima_parse_rule(char *rule, struct ima_rule_entry *entry)
else
result = -EINVAL;
break;
+ case Opt_appraise_algos:
+ ima_log_string(ab, "appraise_algos", args[0].from);
+
+ if (entry->allowed_algos) {
+ result = -EINVAL;
+ break;
+ }
+
+ entry->allowed_algos =
+ ima_parse_appraise_algos(args[0].from);
+ /* invalid or empty list of algorithms */
+ if (!entry->allowed_algos) {
+ result = -EINVAL;
+ break;
+ }
+
+ entry->flags |= IMA_VALIDATE_ALGOS;
+
+ break;
case Opt_permit_directio:
entry->flags |= IMA_PERMIT_DIRECTIO;
break;
@@ -1714,6 +1757,23 @@ static void ima_show_rule_opt_list(struct seq_file *m,
seq_printf(m, "%s%s", i ? "|" : "", opt_list->items[i]);
}
+static void ima_policy_show_appraise_algos(struct seq_file *m,
+ unsigned int allowed_hashes)
+{
+ int idx, list_size = 0;
+
+ for (idx = 0; idx < HASH_ALGO__LAST; idx++) {
+ if (!(allowed_hashes & (1U << idx)))
+ continue;
+
+ /* only add commas if the list contains multiple entries */
+ if (list_size++)
+ seq_puts(m, ",");
+
+ seq_puts(m, hash_algo_name[idx]);
+ }
+}
+
int ima_policy_show(struct seq_file *m, void *v)
{
struct ima_rule_entry *entry = v;
@@ -1825,6 +1885,12 @@ int ima_policy_show(struct seq_file *m, void *v)
seq_puts(m, " ");
}
+ if (entry->flags & IMA_VALIDATE_ALGOS) {
+ seq_puts(m, "appraise_algos=");
+ ima_policy_show_appraise_algos(m, entry->allowed_algos);
+ seq_puts(m, " ");
+ }
+
for (i = 0; i < MAX_LSM_RULES; i++) {
if (entry->lsm[i].rule) {
switch (i) {

Privacy Policy